kicad-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Undo paradigms
On 2019-05-27 11:05, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
On 27/05/2019 16:46, Jeff Young wrote:
The Eeschema has one advantage that if you mess it up you get too many
undo steps rather than too few. But it is somewhat crankier code to
I agree that we should have only one scheme. I don’t believe anyone’s
working on it — although it would probably be Tom if anyone was.
Some time ago we introduced with Orson the COMMIT object, which manages
atomic updates to the PCB, lightweight notifications as well as
of undo entries. How about porting this to eeschema?
Yup, that's exactly the idea.