kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #41180
Re: 6.0 Zone filling differences
New, higher-performance bits in, with some (perhaps all) of the bugs fixed.
Testing would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Jeff.
> On 22 Jun 2019, at 17:36, Jeff Young <jeff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There’s no piece of the zone in the middle; that’s just the chamfers on the ends of the spokes.
>
> The zone doesn’t go between the two pads because their thermal relief value doesn’t allow enough room.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
>
>
>> On 22 Jun 2019, at 17:04, Nick Østergaard <oe.nick@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:oe.nick@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> Mmm, I am not sure I under stamd that screenshot. Why are the zone not touchimg the thermal track between the pads while it looks like there is a part of zone area on the middle of the thermal track?
>>
>> lør. 22. jun. 2019 17.58 skrev Jeff Young <jeff@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxx>>:
>> Our current algorithm will produce thermal connections between two pads (with no connections to the zone):
>>
>>
>>
>> I assume no one will lose any sleep over dropping those?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jeff.
>>
>>
>>> On 21 Jun 2019, at 19:49, Jean-Paul Louis <louijp@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:louijp@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Wayne,
>>>
>>> Except in very hugh frequency design (higher UHF spectrum, microwaves and millimeter waves)
>>> were chamfers can create more problems than they solve.
>>>
>>> This chamfer should be user optional, the best being individual part layout optional.
>>>
>>> Just my extra data point,
>>>
>>> Jean-Paul
>>> N1JPL
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jun 21, 2019, at 8:05 AM, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jeff,
>>>>
>>>> Users are going to expect chamfering if there is an option for it. I
>>>> don't see how you are going to avoid adding chamfering to the spokes
>>>> unless we decide to do away with chamfering as an option. I don't think
>>>> that's good idea because right angles on board geometry is generally
>>>> frowned upon.
>>>>
>>>> Wayne
>>>>
>>>> On 6/20/19 4:24 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
>>>>> Turns out there’s a slightly unintended side effect.
>>>>>
>>>>> Before:
>>>>>
>>>>> Note the two truncated thermal spokes to the surface-mount pads at the
>>>>> lower right.
>>>>>
>>>>> After:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The bug is fixed, but not that the junctions between the spokes and the
>>>>> zone body are no longer chamfered.
>>>>>
>>>>> I’d say the “after” is better in that respect too, but again it’s
>>>>> definitely different.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Jeff.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20 Jun 2019, at 19:50, Reece Pollack <reece@xxxxxxx <mailto:reece@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>> <mailto:reece@xxxxxxx <mailto:reece@xxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Memory is the second thing to go as one ages.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't remember what the first one is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> *From: *"Jeff Young" <jeff@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxx> <mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxx>>>
>>>>>> *To: *"jp charras" <jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx>>>
>>>>>> *Cc: *"KiCad Developers" <kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
>>>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, June 20, 2019 2:46:58 PM
>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Kicad-developers] 6.0 Zone filling differences
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wow. That’s sobering. I wrote the board outline clearance changes….
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Age sucks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20 Jun 2019, at 19:04, jp charras <jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> <mailto:jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 20/06/2019 à 19:24, Jeff Young a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe we now have a warning, but I can’t remember what
>>>>>> change it was for. I thought it was for the outline changes,
>>>>>> but from what I can find on the mailing list archive it looks
>>>>>> like we were satisfied that one wouldn’t change anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So remind me what the warning is for?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AFAIK, it is for board outline clearance change (taking in accounf or
>>>>>> not the edge cut graphic items thickness, if I correctly remember).
>>>>>> Zone outline changes (only activated if the kicad_advanced
>>>>>> "ForceThickZones=0" option enables it), do not need any warning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reason behind this request is that I have a new fill
>>>>>> algorithm which fixes a long-standing bug regarding one pad’s
>>>>>> thermal ring knocking out another pad’s thermal spoke. It
>>>>>> also allows thermal spokes on custom pad shapes (and would
>>>>>> allow us to support custom number of spokes if we wished).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While this should only change zone fills which would have been
>>>>>> considered errors in the past, it nevertheless changes them.
>>>>>> What’s the prescription for that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Jeff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
>
Follow ups
References
-
6.0 Zone filling differences
From: Jeff Young, 2019-06-20
-
Re: 6.0 Zone filling differences
From: jp charras, 2019-06-20
-
Re: 6.0 Zone filling differences
From: Jeff Young, 2019-06-20
-
Re: 6.0 Zone filling differences
From: Reece Pollack, 2019-06-20
-
Re: 6.0 Zone filling differences
From: Jeff Young, 2019-06-20
-
Re: 6.0 Zone filling differences
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2019-06-21
-
Re: 6.0 Zone filling differences
From: Jean-Paul Louis, 2019-06-21
-
Re: 6.0 Zone filling differences
From: Jeff Young, 2019-06-22
-
Re: 6.0 Zone filling differences
From: Nick Østergaard, 2019-06-22
-
Re: 6.0 Zone filling differences
From: Jeff Young, 2019-06-22