kicad-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Zone min-width isn't
Isn't the thermal spoke width a different setting than the minimum
width? I'm under the impression that these two zone properties control
completely different aspects of the zone fill and have no impact on the
On 7/7/2019 5:01 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> We've done this a few times already with zones. As long as the existing
> fills don't change, we've left the property. Refilling is expected to
> change, I think.
> I'd be in favor of allowing min width to mean min width.
> On 2019-07-07 16:08, Jeff Young wrote:
>> We have a zone property “Minimum Width”. Unfortunately, it isn’t.
>> It’s the width we’ll collapse (so minimum width would be 1nm more).
>> I’d be inclined to fix this (primarily so that thermal spokes and
>> minimum width could be the same), but then we have the old “will
>> change old boards” issue.
>> We could also try and change the property name, but I can’t think of a
>> concise way to express “remove features this width and less”.
>> Ref: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1835674
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp