On 8 Jul 2019, at 13:57, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Isn't the thermal spoke width a different setting than the minimum
width? I'm under the impression that these two zone properties
control
completely different aspects of the zone fill and have no impact on
the
other.
On 7/7/2019 5:01 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
We've done this a few times already with zones. As long as the
existing
fills don't change, we've left the property. Refilling is expected
to
change, I think.
I'd be in favor of allowing min width to mean min width.
-Seth
On 2019-07-07 16:08, Jeff Young wrote:
We have a zone property “Minimum Width”. Unfortunately, it isn’t.
It’s the width we’ll collapse (so minimum width would be 1nm more).
I’d be inclined to fix this (primarily so that thermal spokes and
minimum width could be the same), but then we have the old “will
change old boards” issue.
We could also try and change the property name, but I can’t think of
a
concise way to express “remove features this width and less”.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
Jeff.
Ref: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1835674
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp