kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Jeff Young <jeff@xxxxxxxxx>]

Personally I hate OPT (because it’s somewhat harder to read and more-than-somewhat harder to debug).

I also dislike auto, except in the case of stl::’s overly-verbose iterators.  Again, they make the code harder to read more often than not.

Maybe I’m just showing my age….

> On 24 Nov 2019, at 11:13, Ian McInerney <Ian.S.McInerney@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> What is the current consensus on using OPT types in the code? I know there are some instances where we are already using them from the Boost library (since our C++ version isn't high enough to include them), but is that considered a good type to use more of?
> 
> I am curious, because I am thinking of replumbing the position storage in the tool events to use OPTs for the position, because that will allow for cleaner handling of the position in the tools, and also because I need to pass the positions into the selection routines, and being able to pass an OPT will greatly simplify things (I think).
> 
> -Ian
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp