kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #45592
Re: CVE-2022-23803, CVE-2022-23804, CVE-2022-23946, CVE-2022-23947
One additional question - I know that 5.1.12 was the last planned release in the 5.x series, and that 5.1.12 has the vulnerability. Currently, because of Fedora policy, both F34 and F35 still ship 5.1.12.
I'll ask on the Fedora list if this event qualifies as an exception to the policy, but if not, how involved would it be to patch 5.1.12, or perhaps to spin a 5.1.13 just to fix this issue?
Steve
On 2/16/22 11:49 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
Excellent! I'll note that on the Fedora bugs.
Thanks,
Steve
On 2/16/22 09:44 AM, Ian McInerney wrote:
All 4 CVEs were fixed in the 6.0.2 release and the release announcement was updated last night to say this (to coincide with the public disclosure that happened today). There will be another email on the developer list later today with more details.
-Ian
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 2:18 PM Steven A. Falco <stevenfalco@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:stevenfalco@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I've just received a large number of bugs against KiCad, supposedly due to CVE-2022-23803, CVE-2022-23804, CVE-2022-23946, CVE-2022-23947.
I don't have time to look into them, but I wanted to make them known. There are apparently also bugs for this on the gentoo site - here is one: https://bugs.gentoo.org/833426 <https://bugs.gentoo.org/833426>
Here are the Fedora bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054956 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054956>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054957 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054957>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054959 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054959>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054960 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054960>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054955 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054955>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054973 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054973>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054974 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054974>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054979 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054979>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054980 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054980>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054958 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054958>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054972 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054972>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054978 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054978>
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
Follow ups
References
-
CVE-2022-23803, CVE-2022-23804, CVE-2022-23946, CVE-2022-23947
From: Steven A. Falco, 2022-02-16
-
Re: CVE-2022-23803, CVE-2022-23804, CVE-2022-23946, CVE-2022-23947
From: Ian McInerney, 2022-02-16
-
Re: CVE-2022-23803, CVE-2022-23804, CVE-2022-23946, CVE-2022-23947
From: Steven A. Falco, 2022-02-16