Ah, thanks!
Looks like that was fixed in master but didn't get cherry-picked. The fix is in the v6 branch now.
Seth
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 11:08 AM Ian McInerney <ian.s.mcinerney@xxxxxxxx <mailto:ian.s.mcinerney@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
The second bug appears to be an assertion due to an invalid vector access.
The stack trace is below.
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
#2 std::__replacement_assert at /usr/include/c++/11/x86_64-redhat-linux/bits/c++config.h:2660
#3 std::vector<VECTOR2<int>, std::allocator<VECTOR2<int> > >::operator[] at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:1043
#5 ZONE::HatchBorder at /usr/src/debug/kicad-6.0.4-1.fc34.x86_64/pcbnew/zone.cpp:1031
#6 ZONE::SetBorderDisplayStyle at /usr/src/debug/kicad-6.0.4-1.fc34.x86_64/pcbnew/zone.cpp:882
#7 PCB_PARSER::parseZONE at /usr/src/debug/kicad-6.0.4-1.fc34.x86_64/pcbnew/plugins/kicad/pcb_parser.cpp:5437
#8 PCB_PARSER::parseFOOTPRINT_unchecked at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/unique_ptr.h:173
#9 PCB_PARSER::parseFOOTPRINT at /usr/src/debug/kicad-6.0.4-1.fc34.x86_64/pcbnew/plugins/kicad/pcb_parser.cpp:3211
#10 PCB_PARSER::Parse at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/unique_ptr.h:185
#11 FP_CACHE::Load at /usr/src/debug/kicad-6.0.4-1.fc34.x86_64/pcbnew/plugins/kicad/pcb_plugin.cpp:274
#12 PCB_PLUGIN::FootprintEnumerate at /usr/src/debug/kicad-6.0.4-1.fc34.x86_64/pcbnew/plugins/kicad/pcb_plugin.cpp:2390
This is trying to read the `/usr/share/kicad/footprints//RF_Module.pretty/MOD-nRF8001.kicad_mod` file provided in the standard footprint library (and apparently there is an extra slash entering the path somewhere, but that is extraneous to this). What seems to be happening is that during the parsing, it is finding a hatched zone, but the hatch border has an empty pointbuffer, which then causes the stdlib assert to fire when it is accessed at any index.
-Ian
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:00 PM Seth Hillbrand <seth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:seth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi Steven-
The second bug is locked down. We can't see it without proper access credentials.
Seth
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 6:45 AM Steven A. Falco <stevenfalco@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:stevenfalco@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
There are two SIGABRT bugs reported on Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079984 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079984>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082394 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082394>
The first bug was closed because it was not able to be reproduced. The second one has apparently happened to the reporter several times, but again I don't know if it is reproducible on demand.
Do either of these ring a bell with anyone?
Steve
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
--
KiCad Services Corporation Logo
Seth Hillbrand
*Lead Developer*
+1-530-302-5483
Long Beach, CA
www.kipro-pcb.com <https://www.kipro-pcb.com/> info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
--
KiCad Services Corporation Logo
Seth Hillbrand
*Lead Developer*
+1-530-302-5483
Long Beach, CA
www.kipro-pcb.com <https://www.kipro-pcb.com/> info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
