Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Additionally, I have newer, but really low-end 64-bit laptop that has power management & other drivers problems under any native Linux distros, so I keep 32-bit Kubuntu & Mint virtualized with Virtualbox seamless desktop on top of Windows 10, that uses less resources than 64-bit versions.
Maybe if you really want to drop 32-bit support, could you at least still keep those builds for LTS releases?
Regards, Tom Dnia 30 czerwca 2017 12:56:36 Clay Weber <clay@xxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
The lack of testers, the lack of bug reports, and the lack of response here seem to indicate that i386 users in our community are a rather tiny group. One that is likely shrinking even more.The short lifespans of non-LTS releases do not help, either. Perhaps dropping support now may be the best time to pull the plug.On Jun 29, 2017 4:33 PM, Valorie Zimmerman <valorie.zimmerman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hello folks, Art Alpha 1 is released today: release notes: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtfulAardvark/Alpha1/Kubuntu Please report test results here: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/378/builds If we don't get complete test coverage on the i386 test cases, I think we should drop it now. the KCI doesn't build the images, we get no questions about 32-bit any more, and it is in general a pain to support. Is there any reason to keep it? Valorie -- http://about.me/valoriez -- kubuntu-users mailing list kubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxModify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-users-- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxModify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |