| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On 2010-07-20 11:44, Jonathan Lange wrote:
This is a generic base for that kind of collection. It wouldn't slot comfortably underneath the existing BranchCollection API because the latter exposes Storm's Select objects.Where does it do that?
Good question: turns out it uses that internally but does not expose it after all. That's what I get for trying to compare three Collection implementations at the same time I suppose...
Anyway. Yes, that means it's more feasible than I thought to slot the generic Collection as a base class underneath the BranchCollection API.
Jeroen
| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
