launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

[Stuart Bishop <stuart.bishop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Robert Collins
<robert.collins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Julian Edwards
> <julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thursday 19 August 2010 10:38:48 Stuart Bishop wrote:
>>> Sugar was offering some SQLObject like extensions is not used. I
>>> personally felt we would be better off without them and we should just
>>> do things the Storm preferred way or get the improvements in Storm
>>> core. In particular, it hard codes 'id' as an integer primary key
>>> which is no longer the case.
>>
>> I completely agree.
>>
>> We should be looking to use Storm and pushing upstream to improve it, not
>> creating yet more local changes.
>
> Absolutely. Creating a default implementation of a hook which links
> into a non-storm facility is hardly a local change though.

We still want a local subclass of Storm. I just think we should start
with an empty one, not Sugar.



-- 
Stuart Bishop <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.stuartbishop.net/