launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

[Curtis Hovey <curtis.hovey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 13:17 -0500, Edwin Grubbs wrote:
> For public projects, it makes some sense to allow the project owner to
> lose access to an artefact. For example, if the owner is not
> subscribed to a private bug. 

"Some sense" in the sense that there is not true owner of a public
project? That many people autonomously work on the project and no one
person is responsible for it? This is true.

I think we need to consider the uses/needs for privacy in public
projects...that will be issue 5 that I send out tomorrow.

-- 
__Curtis C. Hovey_________
http://launchpad.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part