launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06270
Re: bug message indices. stable allocation and hidden messages
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:46 AM, John Arbash Meinel
<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Why can't it be written as part of the object, and if you want to insert
> a message into the middle, you have to rewrite all of the rest? I guess
> I don't really see why it has to be write-once.
It can be, thats the trade off I mentioned : rewriting 1000 messages
to have a higher index number is expensive. Supporting it at all is
more complex than not supporting it - and supporting it implies
unstable urls for something that users (reasonably) expect to be
stable.
> So is the issue that if there are hidden messages you shouldn't get gaps
> in the numbering?
>
> Is it something that some users can see these hidden messages and some
> can't? What is the handle on a "hidden" message for people who can
> actually see it?
Messages are hidden by administrators to deal with spam and offensive
language. Another reason to keep the index stable is to let
administrators unhide things if a mistake is made.
-Rob
References