launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #07721
Re: merge-proposal-jobs interruption incident
I spoke with Aaron on IRC. he identified 820510 and 820511 as the biggest bang for the buck. He did not want to mark these as critical. I don't really agree, but I also don't really care a lot. Yellow hopes to tackle at least one of those RSN.
Gary
On Aug 3, 2011, at 7:47 PM, William Grant wrote:
> On 04/08/11 06:25, Gary Poster wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 3, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We had some issues with the merge-proposal-jobs script earlier today:
>>> https://wiki.canonical.com/IncidentReports/2011-08-03-LP-failing-jobs
>>>
>>> I'm pleased to report that everything is working normally now.
>>> Unfortunately, we didn't actually fix anything. It just started working
>>> again when we killed and re-ran it.
>>>
>>> Since it's working now, we don't have enough information to debug it.
>>> We can take proactive steps to give us more info in the future.
>>>
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820511
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820516
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820510
>
> Thanks for investigating, Aaron.
>
>> Are any of these worth special attention (i.e., escalation to critical), since they are related to an incident?
>
> I think some of these need to become critical.
> ParallelLimitedTaskConsumer has been implicated in several incidents
> this year, although not all of them were recorded formally.
>
> William
>
Follow ups
References