launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

[Aaron Bentley <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12-09-17 04:35 PM, Deryck Hodge wrote:
> I think the main argument against using information_type is that
> it supports values that don't apply for Products.  I understand
> that point, but we can limit the values from information_type
> directly and still use information_type without all the headache of
> adding yet another enum that really is just like information_type
> with some values removed.

Specification.infomation_type also does not support the full range of
information_types.  It is limited to PUBLIC, PROPRIETARY and
EMBARGOED, the same as Product.information_type would be.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlBYdgAACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI0bIQCaAu7Kajl+ePmC3oJqZBlSEugX
mIsAnRUo1E9EJSqWh0rgeAL86uCtX2oX
=QyTB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----