launchpad-reviewers team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-reviewers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08120
Re: [Merge] lp:~stevenk/launchpad/branch-use-information_type into lp:launchpad
Review: Approve code
121 + if (self.stacked_on and self.stacked_on.information_type in
122 + PRIVATE_INFORMATION_TYPES and information_type in
123 + PUBLIC_INFORMATION_TYPES):
This linebreaking is still a capital offence in several jurisdictions. One legal spelling is this:
if (self.stacked on
and self.stacked_on.information_type in PRIVATE_INFORMATION TYPES
and information_type in PUBLIC_INFORMATION TYPES):
157 + # If the branch we are stacking on is not public, and we are,
158 + # set our information_type to the stacked on's.
This comment should explain why.
159 + if (self.stacked_on and self.stacked_on.information_type not in
160 + PUBLIC_INFORMATION_TYPES and self.information_type in
161 + PUBLIC_INFORMATION_TYPES):
Another capital offence.
273 + branch = self.factory.makeBranch(
274 + name='branch_%s' % x, private=x > 2)
That linebreak is probably no longer required.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~stevenk/launchpad/branch-use-information_type/+merge/106109
Your team Launchpad code reviewers is subscribed to branch lp:launchpad.
References