launchpad-reviewers team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-reviewers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #13799
[Merge] lp:~jtv/maas/where-would-we-be-without-lint into lp:maas
Jeroen T. Vermeulen has proposed merging lp:~jtv/maas/where-would-we-be-without-lint into lp:maas.
Commit message:
Lint.
Requested reviews:
Launchpad code reviewers (launchpad-reviewers)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/maas/where-would-we-be-without-lint/+merge/131571
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/maas/where-would-we-be-without-lint/+merge/131571
Your team Launchpad code reviewers is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~jtv/maas/where-would-we-be-without-lint into lp:maas.
=== modified file 'src/maasserver/api.py'
--- src/maasserver/api.py 2012-10-26 08:32:22 +0000
+++ src/maasserver/api.py 2012-10-26 10:29:24 +0000
@@ -1576,7 +1576,8 @@
definition = request.data.get('definition', None)
if definition is not None and tag.definition != definition:
return HttpResponse(
- "Definition supplied '%s' doesn't match current definition '%s'"
+ "Definition supplied '%s' "
+ "doesn't match current definition '%s'"
% (definition, tag.definition),
status=httplib.CONFLICT)
nodes_to_add = self._get_nodes_for(request, 'add', nodegroup)
=== modified file 'src/maasserver/tests/test_api.py'
--- src/maasserver/tests/test_api.py 2012-10-26 08:32:22 +0000
+++ src/maasserver/tests/test_api.py 2012-10-26 10:29:24 +0000
@@ -4163,6 +4163,7 @@
client = make_worker_client(nodegroup)
image = make_boot_image_params()
response = self.report_images(nodegroup, [image], client=client)
+ self.assertEqual(httplib.OK, response.status_code)
self.assertEqual(0, recorder.call_count)
def test_report_boot_images_removes_warning_if_images_found(self):
=== modified file 'src/provisioningserver/tags.py'
--- src/provisioningserver/tags.py 2012-10-24 16:29:02 +0000
+++ src/provisioningserver/tags.py 2012-10-26 10:29:24 +0000
@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@
return matched_nodes, unmatched_nodes
-def process_all(client, tag_name, tag_definition, nodegroup_uuid, system_ids, xpath,
- batch_size=None):
+def process_all(client, tag_name, tag_definition, nodegroup_uuid, system_ids,
+ xpath, batch_size=None):
if batch_size is None:
batch_size = DEFAULT_BATCH_SIZE
all_matched = []
@@ -184,7 +184,8 @@
# This also allows us to track if a nodegroup has been processed in the DB,
# without having to add another API call.
post_updated_nodes(
- client, tag_name, tag_definition, nodegroup_uuid, all_matched, all_unmatched)
+ client, tag_name, tag_definition, nodegroup_uuid, all_matched,
+ all_unmatched)
def process_node_tags(tag_name, tag_definition, batch_size=None):
@@ -205,5 +206,6 @@
xpath = etree.XPath(tag_definition)
# Get nodes to process
system_ids = get_nodes_for_node_group(client, nodegroup_uuid)
- process_all(client, tag_name, tag_definition, nodegroup_uuid, system_ids, xpath,
- batch_size=batch_size)
+ process_all(
+ client, tag_name, tag_definition, nodegroup_uuid, system_ids, xpath,
+ batch_size=batch_size)