Re: PPA documentation

["Rafael Proença" <cypherbios@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Monty,

I think all those questions are more 'packaging'-related than PPA specific.
In this case would be better refer to the packaging-guide before getting started (or perhaps mention that in the PPAQuickStart, but this is already being done).

Regards.

On 8/14/07, Monty Taylor <monty@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The PPA docs themselves have been good for me... but there are some
things that might be included or linked to as a lot of the people who
might be using this are the people trying to break in to the world of
being official packagers, so some of the packaging things, as it relates
to uploads might be nice. Like:

When does debuild decide that your package needs to include a source
orig and when does it not? (I've had to force it with the -sa option a
couple of times)

How to "properly" do builds/uploads if you want the package built for
edgy and feisty and gutsy.

I'm sure both of those are in the overall docs somewhere... but I know
it took me a long time to ferret them out.

Thanks! (and thanks for the PPA at all, too)

Matthew Revell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If you've used the PPA beta, have you noticed any point at which you
> felt the documentation let you down?
>
> If you've already mentioned an issue, on this list, with the PPA guide
> then I will pick it up. However, feel free to remention it here if you
> want to add anything to your original observations.
>
> Thanks.
>


--
launchpad-users mailing list
launchpad-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/launchpad-users

-- 
Rafael Proença
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CypherBios
https://launchpad.net/people/cypherbios
http://www.cypherbios.org/blog
http://www.ubuntu-br.org