HI all, We really need clarify and nail down the "acceptable licenses" part of the PPA TOS and PPAQuickStart page. Right now the TOS has: "You understand and agree that any content you upload to PPAs must be freely redistributable by Canonical, and licensed under any OSI approved license. http://opensource.org/licenses/category" The PPAQuickStart page has: "An APT repository of up to 1 gigabyte for material licensed with an [WWW] OSI-approved licence." and further down in the FAQ "Please do not publish packages in your PPA which are not redistributable (the basic requirement for packages in Ubuntu)." Now, since the TOS is authoritative then the FAQ part of PPAQuickStart is not correct. Overall though, IMO, both statements ("OSI approved" and "redistributable") are two extremes and neither are what is intended. The point was that the software should be Free/Libre/Open Source Software, unless I'm mistaken. The OSI approved license list doesn't include important licenses such as Creative Commons that *are* used in Ubuntu. The "redistributable" requirement says nothing towards Freeness. This could include redistributable closed-source applications such as you might find in the Multiverse repository. So, it's very important to have a clear and consistent license policy for PPAs. I'm pretty sure quite a few people have already violated the TOS based on the "redistributable" statement. -Jordan.
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)