On 9/21/07, Mario Limonciello <superm1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm not too sure I agree with this massive expiration on the bug > reports. Just because there was no activity for 60 days doesn't make > the bug invalid. Lots of people have very large queues, and won't be > getting to it for a while. The bugs still do exist and this is making > it appear as though they are insignificant or unnecessary. > While as I understand it LP is currently down to fix this and undo some of the damage this has caused, I think your primary reasoning is a bit flawed. Bugs reports are growing much faster than developers can handle them, really. Why maintain a huge work queue? Nobody but you pays close attention to how many things are in your queue, and how place in a priority queue translates into when it'll be done is a mystical process at best. Justin Dugger
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)