On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:08:28PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Ubuntu sets Fix Released when the fix has been uploaded, although it > isn't necessarily generally available to users yet (because it may still > need to build, be mirrored, etc.). I think this is the right workflow > (we don't want to have to mess around gardening intermediate states for > the sake of the couple of hours it typically takes, or have to concern > ourselves with the semantics in the event that the upload fails to build > on some subset of architectures), but perhaps the text could be > qualified a little bit here. You're talking about the the changelog-bug-closing feature, right? I wonder if the right workflow isn't setting the bug to Fix Released only when the first binary is uploaded (though that would be more complex to implement). > You say that "Won't Fix" should only be used by the project lead. This > is a little too strong when applied to a distribution; there are plenty > of situations where "Won't Fix" may reasonably be applied by an > individual developer rather than the Technical Board. It should > certainly only be used by developers, though. Made two amendments to the text. Thanks! -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)