Forest Bond wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:16:54AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: >> Le mardi 02 octobre 2007 à 18:12 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis a >> écrit : >> >>> So this is interesting, because ideally you want some record that the >>> bug has been forwarded and fixed upstream. >> Sometimes the bug has already been fixed upstream simply because they >> noticed the issue and commited the required changes, in which case there >> is really no need to open and close a bug on their bug tracker > > But you don't *have* to open a bug in their tracker, you can just manually track > the status in launchpad... right? What do you mean with this, setting up an upstream project in Launchpad, and creating a bug task for it in the same bug, and then manually updating it? This is silly IMHO, since a) There will be 2 upstream bug trackers then, one run by upstream, and one run by you in Launchpad, and 2) You will then have to update the upstream task manually. > It really all comes down to modelling the > situation accurately in LP. > > -Forest
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)