-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > This has come up a couple of other times before. How likely is it that > subtrees are going to land soon? My guess is "pretty unlikely", since no one is working on them AFAIK. > If they are still some time off, > would it perhaps be possible to have a data format that can > store rich roots but not subtrees and as such doesn't have to be > marked experimental? Certainly possible. The xml6 serializer (used by the deleted KnitRepositoryFormat2) does that. But it would still be a watershed, and I thought it wasn't worth having a watershed just for rich roots. Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHJxjX0F+nu1YWqI0RAj7hAJoCQ1kj6/MBdYBMsfW//xilOSI6rgCfXAks qkSPr9Dg+uJaOm7dIMooMFk= =bKOf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)