On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:43:19AM -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote: > Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > This has come up a couple of other times before. How likely is it that > > subtrees are going to land soon? > My guess is "pretty unlikely", since no one is working on them AFAIK. Wouter commented to me in person a couple of days ago he thought they weren't too far off, but I'm not sure whether he has any plans to work on them. Wouter? > > If they are still some time off, > > would it perhaps be possible to have a data format that can > > store rich roots but not subtrees and as such doesn't have to be > > marked experimental? > Certainly possible. The xml6 serializer (used by the deleted > KnitRepositoryFormat2) does that. But it would still be a watershed, > and I thought it wasn't worth having a watershed just for rich roots. Why does it have to be a watershed? Would it be possible to simply limit downgrades to revisions that have their tree root set to bzrlib.inventory.ROOT_ID. Cheers, Jelmer -- Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@xxxxxxxxx> - http://jelmer.vernstok.nl/
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)