-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:43:19AM -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote: >>> would it perhaps be possible to have a data format that can >>> store rich roots but not subtrees and as such doesn't have to be >>> marked experimental? >> But it would still be a watershed, > Why does it have to be a watershed? With non-rich roots, there's no way of storing the last-modifying revision, so when necessary, we pretend that it changes for every revision. With rich roots, it changes extremely rarely. There's no way of representing that in a non-rich-root format. > Would it be possible > to simply limit downgrades to revisions that have their tree root set > to bzrlib.inventory.ROOT_ID. The only revisions that could be downgraded would be those that were originally converted from xml5. Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHJx460F+nu1YWqI0RAvN5AJ94aladxqgmtw+x2y6E6sPOWDjTOQCeJLn4 43KWTwERaZAraMH0oL5gCHI= =K0E+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)