Re: ANNOUNCE: Launchpad mailing lists beta test

["(``-_-´´) -- Fernando" <ubuntu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thursday 14 February 2008 01:26:10 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> 
> A little over a year ago I joined the Launchpad team to help deploy mailing
> lists as another tool at your disposal when collaborating on open source
> software using Launchpad.  Mailing lists are an outstanding way to cultivate a
> community around your project, not only in real-time, but also with an eye
> toward the historical record of your project as embodied in its archives.  On
> behalf of the entire Launchpad development team, I am happy to announce the
> availability of Launchpad team mailing lists to you, our beta testers.
> 
> Enjoy,
> -Barry

Although all this seems really nice, I've found somethings strange in the email headers:

[code]
Delivered-To: ubuntu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Received: by 10.82.114.11 with SMTP id m11cs290921buc;
        Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:26:18 -0800 (PST)
 Received: by 10.65.242.11 with SMTP id u11mr1457256qbr.27.1202952377022;
        Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:26:17 -0800 (PST)
 Return-Path: <barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Received: from mail.wooz.org (216-15-33-253.c3-0.slvr-ubr2.lnh-slvr.md.static.cable.rcn.com [216.15.33.253])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d12si1948512qbc.3.2008.02.13.17.26.16;
        Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:26:17 -0800 (PST)
 Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 216.15.33.253 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) client-ip=216.15.33.253;
 Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 216.15.33.253 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) smtp.mail=barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Received: from mission.wooz.org (mission.wooz.org [192.168.11.17])
        by mail.wooz.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41126E3C45
        for <ubuntu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:26:10 -0500 (EST)
 Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 From: Barry Warsaw <barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 [/code]

No SPF, no Canonical smtp, an PGP key....
Is this a valid email?

Thanks.

-- 
BUGabundo  :o)
(``-_-´´)	http://Ubuntu.BUGabundo.net
Linux user #443786    GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB
My new micro-blog @ http://BUGabundo.net
ps. My emails tend to sound authority and aggressive. I'm sorry in advance. I'll try to be more assertive as time goes by...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.