On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Brian Murray <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was reviewing bugs that can expire in Ubuntu and became curious about > one of the expiry criteria[0] - 'it is not marked as a duplicate of > another bug'. > > What is the logic and thought process behind that criteria? I'd think > that the bug with duplicates is the one that shouldn't be eligible for > expiry. I think the reasoning is that once a bug is marked as a duplicate, it no longer has a status of its own, therefore it's impossible for it to expire. -- Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)