On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:15:56PM -0300, Celso Providelo wrote: > >> You cannot sanely distribute the same binary version built in > >> different contexts (series), thus you cannot copy only the source to > >> be rebuilt in another series. The publisher won't be able to place the > >> new binaries in the pool/ directory and APT won't be able to do the > >> right thing when installing it or upgrading the system. > > > > That the option to copy from gutsy to hardy and rebuild exists when it > > is impossible to do should be considered a bug. If it can't be done, > > why supply a button that pretends to allow it? > > Then it's a *very* different bug that what was suggested in the initial email. > > The copy infrastructure is fine (and I assume you understand it better > now), the problem you are pointing is that the form fields are not > interactive. As in: Weeeelllll... actually, my feeling is that the UI is *very* misleading, even if the backend works well. I've tried to use it myself, and assist end-users, and every time I've gotten stuck and had to back out to putting a note "talk to celso about copy-packages" on my todo list. I think Martin A. might be a great person to talk to and see if we can figure out a way to improve this. BTW, I might even be convinced of trying to push for binary rebuilds now that I'm already in trouble over everything else.. <wink> -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)