Martin Pitt wrote:
In fact this spethial case has bothered me a lot. We have never supported running multiple evolution packages in parallel, since we don't do them (our package name does not have the version number, for example). Therefore I don't actually see a reason to not change the domain to just "evolution" in our packages?
And while we're at it, maybe gcc should be changed in the other direction? AFAIK gcc-3.4, gcc-4.1 etc. all use the same domain even though they can easily run side by side. Worth patching up the packages maybe?
Jeroen
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)