On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Martin Pool<mbp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/6/19 Celso Providelo <celso.providelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> I understand your problem, although I find it very unlikely that we >> will open the gates for binaries generated outside LP, because it >> defeats a very important aspect of PPAs, trusted source -> binary >> path. > > It is a bit strange to me that the PPAs would potentially trust > Richard to upload source, but not trust him to upload binaries. I > suppose source packages have a level of auditability, perhaps after > the fact, that binaries do not. > >> We can always fallback to the official ubuntu backports repository or >> the debian one (which was the original way of solving this) and/or > > Can we get ppc debs into the official backports? If so, that would be > a good way to proceed. > Just a side note, but anything that is managed as a component of Ubuntu is built on all architectures; *-backports are available for all ports architectures). >> maybe hosting the signed debs in Bzr project in LP. > > If we just want to publish the files it's easy enough to put them in > Launchpad downloads, and in fact that's what I suggested Richard do > for now. But it does have the substantial drawback that it no longer > integrates nicely with apt. > > -- > Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users > Post to : launchpad-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)