On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Martin Pool wrote: >There have been a few cases recently where many people answered the >same question, eg in "Re: [Launchpad-dev] Signing the code of >conduct". I realize this is partly because everyone wants to prove >they know about crypto, but I wonder if it's also because of high list >mail lag? > >For instance my mail in that thread seemed to be stuck on forster for >about three hours, and I still don't have Andrew's mail ><https://lists.launchpad.net/launchpad-dev/msg03021.html> from an hour >ago. > >Received: from adelie.canonical.com (adelie.canonical.com [91.189.90.139]) > by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC70B7CA6 > for <mbp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:26:41 +1100 (EST) >Received: from forster.canonical.com ([91.189.90.190]) > by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) > id 1NsQ2y-0001jH-Hl > for <mbp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:26:40 +0000 >Received: from forster.canonical.com ([91.189.90.190]) > by forster.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 #1 (Debian)) > id 1NsQ2y-0006PH-87 > for <mbp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:26:40 +0000 >Received: from mail-iw0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]) > by forster.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) > id 1NsNMa-0005bf-2B > for <launchpad-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:34:49 +0000 I've followed up internally about some thoughts, but let me ask the dumb question here: you're sure that this message didn't just get stuck waiting for moderator approval right? That can cause the Received timestamps you see here (it's a bit of a FAQ, so I have to ask :). -Barry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)