> > Hello, I recently had to shut down my PPA due to licensing issues (my > > attmepts to comply with upstream license in particularities ended up not > > complying with the LP PPA Terms of Use), I have since discussed with > > upstream and have agreed on redistribution terms which should be more > > compatible with the ToU. > > > > In effect, as a whole, this game is freeware, and I will likewise distribute > > my packaging work as freeware, no modification allowed. > > Thanks for making efforts to fit in with PPA terms of use. As I > recall, the problem previously was that the developer had insisted you > be the only person who could redistribute the game. > > If the game is now freely distributable, then it is okay by the PPA > terms of use. > > The terms say this: > > "any content you upload to PPAs must be freely redistributable by Canonical, > and released under a license permitting redistribution free of charge." > > > Will this be sufficient to comply with the PPA ToU? > > Yes, I believe that fits the requirements of the PPA terms of use. > It'd be good to post a statement from the developer, or something > similar, in the PPA description. I think you did something similar > before. I think this is a mistake. I think not think the package meets the criteria defined in http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines or http://opensource.org/docs/osd I must be able to get the source and be permitted to modify it. -- __Curtis C. Hovey_________ http://launchpad.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)