linaro-pm-wg team mailing list archive

[Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>]

This issue is fixed by checking sanity before executing scripts, patch
has been uploaded.

** Changed in: linaro-power-qa
       Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Linaro
Power Management Working Group, which is the registrant for Linaro PMWG
QA.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017021

Title:
  Sched MC test cases fails even when sched_mc is not enabled at the
  kernel

Status in Linaro Power Management QA testsuite:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  In case SCHED_MC is not available at the kernel, the test suite will
  still fail and run the sched_mc related test cases:

  make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.local/share/lava_test/installed-tests/pwrmgmt/pm-qa/sched_mc'
  ###
  ### sched_01:
  ### test the presence of the 'sched_mc_power_savings' file
  ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#sched_mc_01
  ###
  sched_01.0: checking 'sched_mc_power_savings' exists...                     fail
  make[1]: *** [sched_01.log] Error 1
  ###
  ### sched_02:
  ### test the topology is implemented in the kernel
  ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#sched_mc_02
  ###
  sched_02.0/cpu0: checking topology is enabled...                            pass
  sched_02.0/cpu1: checking topology is enabled...                            pass
  ###
  ### sched_03:
  ### test the topology files are present
  ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#sched_mc_03
  ###
  sched_03.0/cpu0: checking 'core_id' exists...                               pass
  sched_03.1/cpu0: checking 'core_siblings' exists...                         pass
  sched_03.2/cpu0: checking 'core_siblings_list' exists...                    pass
  sched_03.3/cpu0: checking 'physical_package_id' exists...                   pass
  sched_03.4/cpu0: checking 'thread_siblings' exists...                       pass
  sched_03.5/cpu0: checking 'thread_siblings_list' exists...                  pass
  sched_03.0/cpu1: checking 'core_id' exists...                               pass
  sched_03.1/cpu1: checking 'core_siblings' exists...                         pass
  sched_03.2/cpu1: checking 'core_siblings_list' exists...                    pass
  sched_03.3/cpu1: checking 'physical_package_id' exists...                   pass
  sched_03.4/cpu1: checking 'thread_siblings' exists...                       pass
  sched_03.5/cpu1: checking 'thread_siblings_list' exists...                  pass
  ###
  ### sched_04:
  ### test the change are effective for the 'sched_mc_power_savings' file
  ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#sched_mc_04
  ###
  sched_04.0: checking setting value to 0...                                  fail
  sched_04.1: checking setting value to 1...                                  fail
  sched_04.2: checking setting value to 2...                                  fail
  sched_04.3: checking setting invalid value to 3...                          pass
  sched_04.4: checking setting invalid value to -1...                         pass
  make[1]: *** [sched_04.log] Error 1
  make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
  make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/.local/share/lava_test/installed-tests/pwrmgmt/pm-qa/sched_mc'
  make: *** [check] Error 2

  This can be the expected behaviour, but I got the wrong impression
  from the logs, as it seems it's partially supported. 'Skipped' would
  probably be a better description.

  Also, I'm confused if one single 'fail' should make 'make -k check' to
  get a !0 return code. At LAVA, if the test script returns !0, it'll
  think that the test case it self failed to run, and not that it
  produced failed results.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-power-qa/+bug/1017021/+subscriptions