linaro-pm-wg team mailing list archive
-
linaro-pm-wg team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00313
[Bug 1091027] Re: pwrmgmt test results appear to be being mis-parsed
Well, the "appendall={'result': 'pass'}" part of
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-validation/lava-
test/trunk/view/head:/lava_test/test_definitions/pwrmgmt.py#L60 would
certainly explain this! It seems to have been added way back in
2011-09-22 17:58:01 UTC in the commit "Big refactoring branch to make
lava-test use lava-tool. Thanks to Zygmunt and ChiThu!" :(
** Also affects: lava-test
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: lava-test
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Linaro
Power Management Working Group, which is subscribed to Linaro PMWG
Kernel.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091027
Title:
pwrmgmt test results appear to be being mis-parsed
Status in LAVA Automated Testing Framework:
New
Status in Kernel related development for Power Management Working Group:
New
Bug description:
Not sure if this is the right place to report this bug, but anyway:
If you look at
http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/dashboard/permalink/test-
result/73d8c24e-f7e5-11e1-87d2-09853ce0001d/1/
you see that the test is reported as passing. But if you follow the
link to the log file:
http://validation.linaro.org/lava-
server/dashboard/attachment/181953/view#L9
you see that it looks like it ought to have been reported as a
failure. What's going on here?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lava-test/+bug/1091027/+subscriptions
References