linaro-project-management team mailing list archive
-
linaro-project-management team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00689
Re: action: acceptance criteria on roadmap cards
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Christian Robottom Reis <kiko@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:29:44AM -0600, Mounir Bsaibes wrote:
> > Sometimes some of the acceptance criteria is met, but not all.
> > In that case, I added a sub-section in the closeout section called "
> > proposal for future development"
>
> That's fine. But Joey's main point is that there are cards that are
> called "complete" which aren't being tested for validation criteria /by
> the PM himself/. If the PM or someone other than the tech lead/developer
> can't verify the AC, then you can't really be confident it was done.
>
Agreed.
One of my lessons learned for this quarter is to have a Work item for each
Acceptance Criteria specifically spelled out in a blueprint to make sure
each acceptance criteria is covered.
Additionally, we should verify it.
> --
> Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP
> Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935
> Linaro.org: Open Source Software for ARM SoCs
>
--
Mounir Bsaibes
Project Manager
Follow Linaro.org:
facebook.com/pages/Linaro/155974581091106
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg
http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog>
References