linaro-project-management team mailing list archive

[Zach Pfeffer <zach.pfeffer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Feedback:

1. The Linaro information model needs to be simplified or it needs a
different visualization.

2. Wouldn't it be simpler to just ditch Launchpad, and run everything
out of Jira?

3. This is inflexible and inaccurate:

"Which component a card belongs to. The components reflect the Linaro
Engineering organisation structure - each component is an engineering
Working Group"

The Android team is not a WG yet it owns cards and most of the cards
it would own would be composed of cross team efforts. With this we're
just reinforcing the Silo system we have in place.

4. Can you remove the stipple marks from the flow diagram?

5. We still need some way to capture recurring work.

6. There's nothing about how tracking will be communicated - i.e. how
techleads should communicate how a card is going via BP and WIs.

On 2 May 2012 00:23, Ilias Biris <ilias.biris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello folks
>
> Since there was no comment on this write-up, I will move it under the
> OPSCOM wiki area, today. Feel free to send your feedback if you have any.
>
> Cheers,
> Ilias
>
>
> On 26/04/12 04:09, Ilias Biris wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I have put together a first draft of the roadmap process as implemented
>> in JIRA. The draft can be found in
>>
>> https://wiki.linaro.org/IliasBiris/RoadmapProcessWithJIRA
>>
>> It describes the Linaro high-level  information model regarding JIRA and
>> Launchpad artifacts (eg cards vs blueprints) and also shows how the card
>> workflow looks like in JIRA (also showing which user types have access
>> to the various transitions available).
>>
>> If you would like to review this page and give feedback I would be
>> grateful. Any questions or issues that you may have are welcome. Once
>> this is updated based on comments I receive it will be moved under
>> https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/ to serve as more "formal" document.
>>
>> Note there are some sections at the end of the document which are not
>> filled in yet, those are going to be added by the end of the week,
>> however their absence does not need to stop this RFC from going out.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>
>
> --
> Ilias Biris ilias.biris@xxxxxxxxxx
> Project Manager, Linaro
> M: +358504839608, IRC: ibiris Skype: ilias_biris
> Linaro.org│ Open source software for ARM SoCs



-- 
Zach Pfeffer
Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog