linaro-project-management team mailing list archive

[Ilias Biris <ilias.biris@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I am opening this to the TLs and project managers for feedback since
there was no opposing feedback from OPSCOM. I would like to have this
settled before Connect @ Hong Kong.

The proposal is to remove the PLANNED state from our roadmap process,
and assume that when a card is ACCEPTED it already has a proposed
delivery cycle (fixVersion field value in JIRA). Doing that would
simplify our process.

Cheers,


On 08/05/12 16:55, Ilias Biris wrote:
> Hello folks
> 
> I have been reviewing the content and states for the roadmap process, in
> order to align the following pages
> 
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/Roadmap
> https://wiki.linaro.org/OPSCOM/RoadmapProcessWithJIRA
> 
> I would like to suggest that the PLANNED state is removed from the
> process, and its requirements + outputs are merged with ACCEPTED state
> (in the first wiki these are New/Accepted and Qn/Planned states
> respectively). Nowadays we usually have cards with a target cycle when
> they come for acceptance by the TSC. Even if they do not, we can make it
> a rule that accepted cards will always have a defined target delivery
> cycle.
> 
> Is there any objection? Does anyone see a particular value for keeping
> the PLANNED state in the process?
> 
> thanks,


-- 
Ilias Biris ilias.biris@xxxxxxxxxx
Project Manager, Linaro
M: +358504839608, IRC: ibiris Skype: ilias_biris
Linaro.org│ Open source software for ARM SoCs