linaro-project-management team mailing list archive
-
linaro-project-management team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00921
Re: Call for contribution - Linaro 12.10 development cycle highlights
On 26 November 2012 13:06, Alexander Sack <alexander.sack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Jakub Pavelek
> <jakub.pavelek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 26 November 2012 10:35, Fathi Boudra <fathi.boudra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 26 November 2012 11:29, Alexander Sack <alexander.sack@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> On 22 October 2012 04:30, Alexander Sack <alexander.sack@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Fathi Boudra
> >> >>> <fathi.boudra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>>> Hi TLs/PMs,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The initial wiki page for the cycle highlights is online:
> >> >>>> https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1210/Release/Highlights
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The initial page is auto-generated, based on the headline of the
> >> >>>> implemented blueprints targeted for this development cycle.
> >> >>>> The wiki page is mostly empty as *4* blueprints on *72* have been
> >> >>>> implemented.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Please, update the blueprints status and/or fill your respective
> >> >>>> section ASAP.
> >> >>>> Thanks in advance for your help.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Amitk had the idea to get all the work items completed on all
> >> >>> blueprints included in the initial higlights page and then have him
> >> >>> hand edit based off that...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Can we try that next month?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> From what I understand Amitk would have to move DONE work items to a
> >> >>> Work Items (milestone): section in order to make it possible for us
> to
> >> >>> extract that info automatically for him, right? Amit, does that
> sound
> >> >>> reasonable to try out next month for PM blueprints?
> >> >>
> >> >> +1, would love to see this happen for KWG BPs too.
> >> >
> >> > Fathi: are we getting this info for kernel and power preseeded on
> >> > highlight for manual editing this month?
> >>
> >> I was writing the call for contribution mail right now.
> >> Highlights wiki page is already up-to-date.
> >
> >
> > It seems to be really picky, took only two work items :(
>
> I guess if you go to your engineers and fix the WI section to better
> reflect what was done for this month, Fathi would be willing to rerun
> his script and update the highlights section to give you a better
> start to edit :)
>
The WI sections for KWG blueprints seem to be reflecting what was done just
fine, yet almost none were picked by the scripting, like few examples:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+spec/android-lowmem-upstreaming
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+spec/android-keyreset-upstreaming
should have been picked.
I think the issue is the formulation of "*targeted to this cycle*" - in KWG
we target typically upstream kernel releases, meaning our series are
upstreamlinux and our milestones are 3.7, 3.7 and 3.9. Looking at the items
picked for this month's highlights, only blueprints that are not
up-streaming work (like the one analyzing kernel size and writing a report)
got picked up.
Do we have similar situation in the Android team with nothing being
collected despite plenty of blueprints in 12.11?
Br,
--jakub
Follow ups
References