linaro-release team mailing list archive

[Dave Pigott <881292@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah. OK. Misunderstood. Of course, the output of l-m-c -h told you that
LAVA was using the old one.

Sorry about that.

On 26 Oct 2011, at 09:31, Mattias Backman wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Dave Pigott <881292@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> When we deprecate options it breaks automated systems. Maybe we should
>> try to take care in the future to support the old behaviour with a
>> "deprecated" warning being issued, and not remove the support until the
>> next release?
> 
> Actually the old options are not touched at all, they still work and
> there's no plan for removing them. The only reason there's no
> deprecation warning is that adding the aliases was trivial and adding
> deprecation messages would take a little (admittedly very little)
> effort. We can make sure to add warnings a couple of releases before
> the old options are removed, if they ever will be.
> 
> -- 
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Linaro
> Validation Team, which is subscribed to LAVA Dispatcher.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881292
> 
> Title:
>  --image-file and --image-size do not work in l-m-c
> 
> Status in LAVA Dispatcher:
>  Confirmed
> Status in Linaro Image Tools:
>  Fix Released
> 
> Bug description:
>  The lava-dispatcher is failing to deploy the images. Here is the trace
>  of the error:
> 
>  root@master:~#  [rc=0]: <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:30:02 AM INFO: About to handle with the build
>  <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:30:02 AM INFO: Downloading the http://ci.linaro.org/kernel_hwpack/linux-arm-soc-for-next/linux-arm-soc-for-next_panda-omap2plus/hwpack_linaro-panda_20111025-0725_b144_armel_supported.tar.gz file using cache
>  <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:44:02 AM INFO: Downloading the http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-nano/20111024/0/images/tar/nano-n-tar-20111024-0.tar.gz file using cache
>  <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:44:02 AM INFO: Executing the linaro-media-create command
>  <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:44:02 AM INFO: sudo flock /var/lock/lava-lmc.lck linaro-media-create --hwpack-force-yes --dev panda --image-file /linaro/images/tmp/tmpeSFdyh/lava.img --binary /linaro/images/tmp/tmpeSFdyh/nano-n-tar-20111024-0.tar.gz --hwpack /linaro/images/tmp/tmpeSFdyh/hwpack_linaro-panda_20111025-0725_b144_armel_supported.tar.gz --image-size 3G
>  None
>  Traceback (most recent call last):
>    File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/actions/deploy.py", line 66, in run
>      use_cache)
>    File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/actions/deploy.py", line 176, in generate_tarballs
>      raise RuntimeError("linaro-media-create failed: %s" % output)
>  RuntimeError: linaro-media-create failed: /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/argparse.py:1576: DeprecationWarning: The "version" argument to ArgumentParser is deprecated. Please use "add_argument(..., action='version', version="N", ...)" instead
>    """instead""", DeprecationWarning)
>  usage: linaro-media-create [-h] [-v] (--mmc DEVICE | --image_file DEVICE)
>                             --dev
>                             {overo,vexpress,mx53loco,snowball_emmc,panda,ux500,igep,mx51evk,smdkv310,snowball_sd,beagle,efikamx,origen,efikasb}
>                             [--rootfs {ext2,ext3,ext4,btrfs}]
>                             [--rfs_label RFS_LABEL] [--boot_label BOOT_LABEL]
>                             [--swap_file SWAP_FILE] [--live | --live-256m]
>                             [--console CONSOLES] --hwpack HWPACKS
>                             [--hwpack-sig HWPACKSIGS] [--hwpack-force-yes]
>                             [--image_size IMAGE_SIZE] --binary BINARY
>                             [--binary-sig BINARYSIG] [--no-rootfs]
>                             [--no-bootfs] [--no-part] [--align-boot-part]
>                             [--nocheck-mmc]
>  linaro-media-create: error: one of the arguments --mmc --image_file is required
>  Lava failed at action deploy_linaro_image with error: Deployment tarballs preparation failed
>  Traceback (most recent call last):
>    File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/__init__.py", line 79, in run
>      action.run(**params)
>    File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/actions/deploy.py", line 70, in run
>      raise CriticalError("Deployment tarballs preparation failed")
>  CriticalError: Deployment tarballs preparation failed
> 
> 
>  You can refer to the job http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/2918 which failed as an example failure.
>  I guess the lava-dispatcher is not completely adopting the latest l-m-c changes.
> 
>  Thanks!!!
>  Deepti.
> 
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/lava-dispatcher/+bug/881292/+subscriptions

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of linaro-
infrastructure-drivers, which is the registrant for Linaro Image Tools.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881292

Title:
  --image-file and --image-size do not work in l-m-c

Status in LAVA Dispatcher:
  Confirmed
Status in Linaro Image Tools:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The lava-dispatcher is failing to deploy the images. Here is the trace
  of the error:

  root@master:~#  [rc=0]: <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:30:02 AM INFO: About to handle with the build
  <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:30:02 AM INFO: Downloading the http://ci.linaro.org/kernel_hwpack/linux-arm-soc-for-next/linux-arm-soc-for-next_panda-omap2plus/hwpack_linaro-panda_20111025-0725_b144_armel_supported.tar.gz file using cache
  <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:44:02 AM INFO: Downloading the http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-nano/20111024/0/images/tar/nano-n-tar-20111024-0.tar.gz file using cache
  <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:44:02 AM INFO: Executing the linaro-media-create command
  <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:44:02 AM INFO: sudo flock /var/lock/lava-lmc.lck linaro-media-create --hwpack-force-yes --dev panda --image-file /linaro/images/tmp/tmpeSFdyh/lava.img --binary /linaro/images/tmp/tmpeSFdyh/nano-n-tar-20111024-0.tar.gz --hwpack /linaro/images/tmp/tmpeSFdyh/hwpack_linaro-panda_20111025-0725_b144_armel_supported.tar.gz --image-size 3G
  None
  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/actions/deploy.py", line 66, in run
      use_cache)
    File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/actions/deploy.py", line 176, in generate_tarballs
      raise RuntimeError("linaro-media-create failed: %s" % output)
  RuntimeError: linaro-media-create failed: /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/argparse.py:1576: DeprecationWarning: The "version" argument to ArgumentParser is deprecated. Please use "add_argument(..., action='version', version="N", ...)" instead
    """instead""", DeprecationWarning)
  usage: linaro-media-create [-h] [-v] (--mmc DEVICE | --image_file DEVICE)
                             --dev
                             {overo,vexpress,mx53loco,snowball_emmc,panda,ux500,igep,mx51evk,smdkv310,snowball_sd,beagle,efikamx,origen,efikasb}
                             [--rootfs {ext2,ext3,ext4,btrfs}]
                             [--rfs_label RFS_LABEL] [--boot_label BOOT_LABEL]
                             [--swap_file SWAP_FILE] [--live | --live-256m]
                             [--console CONSOLES] --hwpack HWPACKS
                             [--hwpack-sig HWPACKSIGS] [--hwpack-force-yes]
                             [--image_size IMAGE_SIZE] --binary BINARY
                             [--binary-sig BINARYSIG] [--no-rootfs]
                             [--no-bootfs] [--no-part] [--align-boot-part]
                             [--nocheck-mmc]
  linaro-media-create: error: one of the arguments --mmc --image_file is required
  Lava failed at action deploy_linaro_image with error: Deployment tarballs preparation failed
  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/__init__.py", line 79, in run
      action.run(**params)
    File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/actions/deploy.py", line 70, in run
      raise CriticalError("Deployment tarballs preparation failed")
  CriticalError: Deployment tarballs preparation failed

  
  You can refer to the job http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/2918 which failed as an example failure.
  I guess the lava-dispatcher is not completely adopting the latest l-m-c changes.

  Thanks!!!
  Deepti.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lava-dispatcher/+bug/881292/+subscriptions