linuxdcpp-team team mailing list archive

[Jacek Sieka <arnetheduck@xxxxxxxxx>]

do we *really* need support for more than one upnp implementation?
regarding passive, isn't the external ip fetched from upnp? without that, active mode is useless...in the long run, a browser style infobar appearing would probably be the nicest solution...falling back to passive is maybe not desirable but still better than not working at all (and it's closer to the truth - when there's no upnp setup, we're effectively in passive mode)

-- 
UPnP does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of LinuxDC++
Team, which is subscribed to LinuxDC++.

Status in ApexDC++ - The Pinnacle of File-Sharing: New
Status in DC++: In Progress
Status in Linux DC++: New

Bug description:
Version 0.706.

I have UPnP configured correctly in my OS (Windows XP) and my router (Linksys WRT54GL). eMule, Miranda, Skype, uTorrent all work fine and correctly setup ports. However, dc++ does not. It used to work few times, but now it just complains that failed to setup ports. I've run upnp sniffer, and it seems that it doesn't even send out UPnP packets.

If you need additional information, please tell what kind and how to get it :)