linuxdcpp-team team mailing list archive

[eMTee <189241@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This looks really nice. I think

1) should not be a problem
2) its up to the Linux devs to solve it for themselves. DC++'s main target is the WIndows platform and in 99.9% of cases we (will) get the crash reports from people using Windows (I mean this should not delay to add this important feature to DC++ asap)
3) I think the old method is the proper way because the .pdb file can be deleted optionally if someone doesn't need it. It adds another step in the task of creating the release packages but that's the only disadvantage I can think of.
4) it needs to contain at least the os version, architecture, build revno, what (local/profile) mode used, maybe the paths or even contents of settings .xml files (the latter can be a privacy issue maybe)...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Dcplusplus-team, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189241

Title:
  Exception Info

Status in ADCH++:
  Confirmed
Status in DC++:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Feature Request:
  Generating an ExceptionInfo.txt like the old dc++'s used to do would be nice.