← Back to team overview

lubuntu-desktop team mailing list archive

Re: [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

 

I had wanted to get feedback sooner and hence see this done earlier.
Most if not all of these changes noted are certainly valid.   Where we
touch upon what the default apps should be, my only concern is that we
do not have a lot of revs.  If we are going to split the seed to produce
variants of default apps, we should do so now.  If not, I think we
should accept that it will be resolved as a post-Karmic issue and simply
come together to make the best choices we can for this first release.

Julien Lavergne wrote:
> @Martin-Eric
> you should publish a bzr branch and propose to merge with the current one for all the fixes you done. It should be easier than a patch.
> Also, the choice of defaults applications should be discuss separately, the more important for now is to add the package itself to the repository. It's easier to made adjustments after.
> 
> Just a remember, we are in Feature Freeze, so it needs a Freeze
> Exception (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess)
> 
begin:vcard
fn:David Sugar
n:Sugar;David
org:Canonical
adr:;;;;;;United States
email;internet:david.sugar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
title:Mobile Developer
tel;work:+1 609 465 5336
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.canonical.com
version:2.1
end:vcard


References