← Back to team overview

lubuntu-desktop team mailing list archive

[Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

 

> Thanks for making this clear. The goal for lubuntu was from the start to build a strong and broad
> community, that can take care of tasks.  For example Debian packages that have been made
> available during recent months by Andrew Lee and others were also planned and released
> to lay the groundwork for lubuntu.
> How should a formalizing governance look like? Is it necessary at this stage?

With respect to governance, Scott notes we do have a LOT of new faces in
this team, indeed more than I realized.  Yet, and he correctly points
out, we do not have a real procedure for resolving questions or disputes
like what should be in the seed other than "discussing" (or shouting ;)
on the list.  I also note there is a desire to have Lubuntu eventually
become an Ubuntu disto in the sense of things like Xubuntu and Kubuntu.
These goals suggest there should be some governance, and it should
resemble where it exists what other teams do.

I really have only a few suggestions.

First, there should be a separate release team or if you will something
like a "Lubuntu Council" that does manage the seed and meta branches and
hence can resolve what should be in it or any other issues should
disputes actually arise.  I suggest myself, you, Martin Eric, Maybe
Oliver, and Rebentisch initially, at least provisionally to get through
the remainder of the Karmic cycle, and this also gives the project as a
whole some stability going into UDS as well as a little time for the
rest of the community to decide what we really wish to use for
governance going forward and whether this was correct to do or not :).

Second, I suggest given that UDS for Karmic "+1" is likely going to be
in two months, that we draft a new spec for that UDS for/from and most
especially WITH the Lubuntu team and community.  Indeed, it is the
approach of UDS is one reason I think it would be good to establish some
things like governance now rather than to do so later.

Third, I suggest for now a monthly irc schedule we could put up on
Fridge.

-- 
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.

Status in Ubuntu: New
Status in “pam” package in Debian: New

Bug description:
I have a preliminary seed and meta for this related to Karmic blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop and this should get uploaded to revu later today.



Follow ups

References