lubuntu-desktop team mailing list archive

[Steve <yorvik.ubunto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:40:35 -0000, David Robert Lewis (ethnopunk)  
<ethnopunk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> `
>
> Steve wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:27:58 -0000, 神癒礁湖 <rafaellaguna@xxxxxxxxx>  
> > wrote:
> >
> > > LOL. Discussion about browser is out of the box! :-)
> > >
> > > OK, fully agree with Julián Alarcón and Jonay Santana. I'm only a
> > > designer (and was a coder, but not now). Mother's impressions are good
> > > as they are perfect beta testers.
> > >
> > > Midori and Arora are the best browser for this release / distro. Arora
> > > was even capable to load complex certificates accesing the tricky
> > > goverment pages (educational ministry, for example) and not Midori. So,
> > > equation gets simple.
> > >
> > > We have to keep an eye on speed, easyness and also features, and Midori
> > > lack a bit of functions that are already implemented on Arora.
> > >
> > > If anybody wants a geek distro try compiling a minial Gentoo with that
> > > rare fork of KDE. Lubuntu must be installable on any machine with ANY
> > > user.
> > Not tried Arora, another one to look at.
> > As the browser is probably the most important piece of software, from a  
> > users perspective, this has to be got right.  The problem for me is, I  
> > like my 'bells & whistles" on my browser and find it hard to use some  
> > of the simpler ones.  I’m quite the opposite with media players, I  
> > dislike all this play list silliness and other complications.
>
> Chromium is great. However, I still think the distro should be called  
> Lewbuntu. :)
I thought LoUbuntu :)



--
Steve