lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Greg Faith <gregfaith@xxxxxxxxx>]

I have just about wore out one of my spare hard drives tonight, but I can
say the i386 desktop and the amd64 desktop isos are working just fine.
Tested both live desktops and made six installs all clean.  Backgrounds are
fine for me.
nm_geo

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> As I noted in an earlier email, all the iso's have been re-spun and put
> onto http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/208/builds
>
> <http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/208/builds>Please do try
> those and let us know how you get on.
>
> regards,
>
> Phill.
>
>
> On 1 March 2012 00:43, Paul Gorski <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>   Regarding problems with 20120228.1 desktop and 201202727 alternate
>> PowerPC Lubuntu isos, they are mostly not usable or viable for testing for
>> me.
>> When might we expect the next versions? If there is any information I can
>> provide to help identify the cause, let me know what to look for.
>>
>> Again, on my own Macs:
>>
>> G3 iMac - 28.1 desktop boots to command prompt during install
>> G4 eMac - 28.1 desktop boots, but fails/crashes at Keyboard setup during
>> install
>> G4 iBook - 28.1 desktop boots, installs
>>
>> and the 201202727 alternate doesn't install properly with any of those
>> listed above or another user's G4 Powerbook. (Boots to command prompt.)
>>
>> I'm still tinkering with the expert mode for the alternate to see if I
>> can get that to work.
>>
>> I had a similar problem with an Ubuntu PPC 201202727 alternate, but then
>> ran sudo apt-get install lubuntu-desktop, then sudo apt-get install lxdm,
>> and I was able to boot that to an lxdm window and login in successfully.
>>
>>
>>   Sincerely,
>> Paul Gorski
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: Julien Lavergne <gilir@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: 神癒礁湖 <rafaellaguna@xxxxxxxxxx>; lubuntu-qa <
>> lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tue, Feb 28, 2012 7:27 pm
>> Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa]
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-artwork/+bug/938472
>>
>>  I'm not talking about any patch here. It is the result of my testing on
>> the current candidate ISO.
>>
>> Julien Lavergne
>>
>> Le 29 févr. 2012 à 01:08, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>
>>  Is that patch in the latest Release Candidate for Beta 1 as we are
>> under 'freeze' at the moment.
>>
>>  regards,
>>
>>  Phill.
>>
>> On 28 February 2012 23:58, Julien Lavergne <gilir@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Le 02/29/2012 12:37 AM, Phill Whiteside a écrit :
>>>
>>>  as this bug is preventing people testing the RC for the beta 1, IMHO
>>> it is a critical bug and should be marked as such. I know Rafael is pulling
>>> his hair out. Just as annoyingly, the QA meeting is three hours before the
>>> Lubuntu one. The bug is already all over the QA tracker like a bad rash ..
>>> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/938472
>>>
>>> Just to add a note, I'm ok it's ugly, but it's not a real blocker.
>>> People still can use and install the ISO (I just done it 1 hour ago). It's
>>> just not really pretty at this moment.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Julien Lavergne
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>>
>>  --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>> Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>