lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Erick,

any particular reason for skipping some of the alpha's?

Regards,

Phill.

On 10 May 2013 07:03, Erick Brunzell <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  On 05/09/2013 12:36 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
>
> 2013/5/9 Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>  Hi Julien,
>
> I note that there is, once again, provision for alphas in the Saucy time
> line[1]. I don't feel that Cadence worked well for us last cycle, as it
> seems to concentrate on ubuntu / unity issues. Because of this, I'd suggest
> that we revert back to what worked well for us pre 10.04. When do you have
> make a decision by? (i.e. is there time to discuss this with the lubuntu
> testers).
>
>  I'm fine with doing Alphas this cycle, as long as we have enough
> testers to test most of ISO for each Alpha. Any opinions from others
> testers ?
>
> Regards,
> Julien Lavergne
>
>
>  If these dates are correct I'd think we'd either want to skip Alpha 2 or
> Alpha 3:
>
>  Alpha 1           June 20th
>
> Alpha 2           July 18th
>
> Alpha 3           August 1st
>
> Beta 1             September 5th
>
> Final Beta       September 26th
>
> Final               October 17th
>
> Lance
>
> PS: I'd prefer we skip Alpha 2.
>
> PPS: We could also skip Alpha 1, opt in on Alpha 2, and then skip Alpha 3.
>
>


-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw