lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Nio Wiklund <nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

The 'Alternate Install (Encryption) in Lubuntu Alternate i386 for Saucy
Daily'

To my understanding the installation worked well. Max gave me the whole
drive.

There was only a minor obstacle: It is somewhat confusing at the
partitioning: The system complained about partition sda5, although I had
asked it to use the whole drive. I went back and wiped all partitions,
and there was still a complaint. Maybe because sda5 is to have the
'crypto-LUKS' file system. But the installation worked and a good
encrypted system was created with a master password before Lubuntu
itself was booted and in turn demanded a password.

The swap partition and zRAM are both working, PCmanFM is not crashing
when I 'eject the current partition' ...

-o-

And when booted from a pendrive, I could mount the small boot partition,
but it should contain no secrets. The real information is in sda5, which was
not mountable: mount returned this error output

mount: unknown filesystem type 'crypto-LUKS'

Best regards
Nio

On 2013-09-04 17:29, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> I'll also test it. Never any harm in having two results!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Phill.
> 
> 
> On 4 September 2013 16:24, Nio Wiklund <nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     Phill,
> 
>     I have that iso already. Should we both test it, would you like to do
>     it, or would you like me to do it?
> 
>     I think it might be a good idea that we are both testing it, because I
>     am not that I understand all the bells and whistles of the encryption.
> 
>     Best regards
>     Nio
> 
>     On 2013-09-04 17:11, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>     > I'm just finishing the alt-64 encrypted one. I'll grab an alt-32
>     and do
>     > the encrypted one for that in a few hours (takes a couple of hours for
>     > me to download an ISO).
>     >
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     >
>     > Phill.
>     >
>     >
>     > On 4 September 2013 16:09, Erick Brunzell <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>
>     > <mailto:lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     On 09/04/2013 12:35 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>     >     > Hi everybody,
>     >     >
>     >     > The desktop isos of Lubuntu Saucy beta 1 are tested rather
>     well by
>     >     now,
>     >     > but the alternate isos are lagging behind. Please help
>     testing the
>     >     > alternate iso files, amd64+mac & armhf+ac100 :-)
>     >     >
>     >     > See this link
>     >     >
>     >     > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/270/builds
>     >     >
>     >     > I am zsyncing the 32-bit alternate iso now, but I have only
>     time for a
>     >     > few more tests before it will be too late ...
>     >     >
>     >     > Best regards
>     >     > Nio
>     >     >
>     >     My current plan is to finish the uncompleted amd64 live tests,
>     and then
>     >     to hit the i386 alternate tests, but I don't know what I'm
>     doing with
>     >     encryption so I'll skip that test.
>     >
>     >     Lance
>     >
>     >     --
>     >     Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa>
>     >     <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa>
>     >     Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     >     <mailto:lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>     >     Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa>
>     >     <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa>
>     >     More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw