lubuntu-wiki-docs team mailing list archive
-
lubuntu-wiki-docs team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00352
Re: Fwd: Lubuntu Manual - Getting Started With Lubuntu
Sub Teams
Under the wiki-docs team we are working on three areas that are linked in
terms of what they contain, but use different methods to deliver that
information:
Wiki <https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation> : The area
you are on now.
Offline Docs<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/DocumentationTeam/Offline_Docs> :
To be included on the CD for help with or without internet access.
Manual <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/DocumentationTeam/Manual> : A
document that can be viewed on line, or downloaded for future reference.
Count me in for the first team. That I can do 100%
For other sub-teams, I can't promise but will jump in only if I have enough
time.
Thanks!
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Right people, can we have a call on who wants what of the three
> projects[1]? Jason is away fora week, so I'd really like this sorted for
> when he gets back as we have to give the devs some sort of idea of what
> will happen.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phill.
> 1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/DocumentationTeam#Sub_Teams
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Kevin Godby <godbyk@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 1 June 2013 06:26
> Subject: Re: Lubuntu Manual - Getting Started With Lubuntu
> To: Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Hello, Phill.
>
> I skimmed through the thread on the lubuntu-users list. I'm the
> primary LaTeX guy on the Ubuntu Manual project. If you're interested
> in using our toolchain to built a Lubuntu manual I'm happy to help out
> with that or answer any questions.
>
> I'm not too clear on the goal or desired form of the Lubuntu manual,
> so here are some general notes.
>
> LaTeX is a great typesetting system for generating PDFs and printed
> documents. It's fairly useless when it comes to generating any other
> formats, though. If you only want to have a PDF or printed book, then
> using LaTeX for the source format will serve you just fine. If you
> want to generate ebooks, web sites, or other formats (in addition to
> or instead of the PDF or printed book), then I would recommend
> *against* using LaTeX as your primary source format. LaTeX is quite
> difficult to parse and there aren't any good parsers out there to
> convert LaTeX reliably to other formats.
>
> The Ubuntu docs project uses Mallard as its source format. Mallard is
> an XML-based markup language. The Mallard files are used in Yelp (the
> desktop documentation viewer) and are converted to HTML for the
> help.ubuntu.com website. Mallard is a decent format for writing
> technical documentation as it was designed with that specific goal in
> mind. Since Mallard is XML-based, it can be parsed easily by many
> tools and converted to other formats.
>
> The Ubuntu docs project used to use Docbook as its source format and
> the other derivative documentation projects and the Ubuntu server
> guide still use Docbook. Docbook, like Mallard, is XML-based. It's
> considerably more complex than Mallard but you can stick to a smaller
> subset of its markup if you like. As with Mallard, Docbook can be
> parsed by a number of tools and converted to other formats fairly
> easily.
>
> To generate the Ubuntu server guide PDF, the Docbook sources are run
> through Apache FOP instead of LaTeX. I'm not all that familiar with
> Apache FOP. I do generally prefer LaTeX's PDFs to those that FOP
> generates, however. I think the output looks a lot nicer. This may
> simply be because the default stylesheets used by Apache FOP aren't
> very good, though.
>
> To sum up my recommendations:
>
> If you're looking to generate topic-based help similar to the current
> documentation on help.ubuntu.com, then I recommend starting with
> Mallard markup. Mallard is designed specifically for this purpose.
> Mallard doesn't appear to be suitable for books, however.
>
> If you're looking to generate *only* a printed book or PDF, then you
> can start with LaTeX as the Ubuntu Manual project has. LaTeX is not
> easily converted to other formats but is specifically designed to
> typeset printed books.
>
> If you're looking to generate a printed book and an ebook and a
> website, then I'd suggest starting with Docbook. While Docbook is more
> complicated than Mallard (there are a lot more tags to learn), it's
> also more flexible and is geared toward generating longer-form
> documents like books. Since it's XML-based, it can be converted
> fairly easily to other formats such as HTML and even LaTeX.
>
> Incidentally, if you do choose to go the Docbook → LaTeX → PDF route,
> I would suggest tweaking the LaTeX to improve it's formatting as
> Docbook doesn't specify all the nitpicky typographical tweaks that
> LaTeX can take advantage of. (But that's just me being a bit of a
> perfectionist.)
>
> Please feel free to forward this email to the lubuntu-users list and
> anyone else you like. And I'm happy to answer any questions about
> LaTeX, the Ubuntu Manual tools and processes, or other markup
> languages (though I'm not quite as familiar with them).
>
> —Kevin Godby
>
>
>
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-wiki-docs
> Post to : lubuntu-wiki-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-wiki-docs
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
--
*Best Regards,*
*amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad/>*
*Start Ubuntu<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/CommunicationsTeam/WOWLubuntu/StartUbuntu>
*
*Test Machine: ASUS F3F Laptop - **Intel Core Duo T2350 @ 1.86GHz with
489MB RAM*
Follow ups
References