maas-devel team mailing list archive
-
maas-devel team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00226
Re: Lifecycle of a node - documentation - 1st draft
-
To:
Dan Harrop-Griffiths <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Jeroen Vermeulen <jtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Thu, 24 May 2012 15:30:19 +0700
-
Cc:
maas-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
In-reply-to:
<CABSaz1Z2vvwdUgrQZLh+1U1Ah1=y+rJkmzWNQV2i_EDRZVRHdQ@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
Separate note, so separate email. From the lifecycle document:
«Manually adding a node
«You can also manually add a node, as an anonymous user (without being
logged in to the MAAS). You can do this by booting up the ubuntu
installer from the node itself, using the server CD or a USB stick.»
Two things in software engineering are hard, they say: cache
invalidation and naming things. Is there some clearer term than
“manual” for this? It's hard to come up with terms that don't depend on
one's point of view. I could imagine the manual process losing its
menial nature, e.g. if we choose implement the same process using
network boots, so that a node would enlist itself after you just hook it
up and turn it on. Then suddenly, the Add Node procedure might be the
one that looked “manual”!
Terms like “local” and “remote” are also very sensitive to perspective…
can you come up with something that nobody could misinterpret?
Jeroen
Follow ups
References