maas-devel team mailing list archive

[Julian Edwards <julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thursday 14 June 2012 12:59:28 Raphaël Badin wrote:
> >> Basically yes.  Maybe we should leave 'provisioningserver' where it is
> >> because it will need to be packaged separately.
> > 
> > I don't see why moving it causes a packaging problem.  There are a few
> > projects with separate packages that live under a common name space.
> 
> It's not a problem at all.  I thought it might just be cleaner to have
> it as a top-level python package to better illustrate that it is a
> module that might be use in a standalone fashion (by the workers).

Honestly, I don't think it's worth spending the time doing that.  It makes 
more sense to me to have everything under the maas name space.

Cheers.