maas-devel team mailing list archive

[Julian Edwards <julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 18 Feb 2014 12:52:52 Jeroen Vermeulen wrote:
> On 18/02/14 00:15, Gavin Panella wrote:
> > There are several opportunities for omission or error. Until there's a
> > `make a-package-from-this-here-branch-wot-i-am-editing` command, or
> > similar, it's going to remain that way. `make -C acceptance build` is
> > the closest to that, that I know of.
> 
> I agree with Gavin.  These things are easy only by virtue of being at
> the forefront of your mind when you could be concentrating more fully on
> other things.

I am genuinely struggling to understand how "bzr bd" is hard.  Yes, it needs a 
way to easily specify a particular branch to use instead of lp:maas, but 
everything else is about as easy as it gets.

I'm currently looking into a Makefile target that builds the current branch, 
without requiring an LXC.

> > Yeah, I don't want signed packages, but I can't figure out how to turn
> > the damned things off.
> 
> Try passing the "-uc" and "-us" options instead of the "-k<key>" one:
> 
>      bzr bd -- -uc -us
> 
> And in all honesty I couldn't tell you off the top of my head where that
> information can be found.  It took a few layers of Debian manpages as I
> recall.
> 
> 
> Jeroen

You don't need to specify those at all, it doesn't stop the package from 
getting built.  Just ignore the errors about signing.